Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge (2022), having an 84.9 score against 84.7. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A80 construction is noticeably older, noticeably heavier and thicker than the Motorola Edge (2022). The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Motorola Edge (2022) and Samsung Galaxy A80 count with extremely similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has higher video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a back camera with more megapixels. Motorola Edge (2022) features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.