Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, getting an 84.7 score against 81. The Motorola Edge (2022) body is extremely newer and a little bit lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's also somewhat thicker. These devices include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge (2022) has the previous 12 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit higher pixel number per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy C9 Pro has slightly more storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Motorola Edge (2022) captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Motorola Edge (2022) has better battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.