Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is a bit better than Motorola Edge (2022), getting a overall score of 86.5 against 84.7. The Galaxy M31 design is noticeably older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Edge (2022). These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12.
Motorola Edge (2022) features a little better processing power than Galaxy M31. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy M31 has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy M31 counts with longer battery life than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.