Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black and White |
| $ 498.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 84.7 score against 77.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge (2022) has an older 12 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The Motorola Edge (2022) design is way lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's way thicker and was released just 20 months before.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a just a little higher screen density and a larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos in low light environments and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge (2022) not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.