Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-06-20 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 global score. The LG V30 is an notably older device than Motorola Edge (2024), but LG managed to build it a bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. The LG V30 has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG V30, because although it has a lot worse screen density and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite larger screen. LG V30 has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge (2024) features a bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a way higher resolution back camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a way better battery performance than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The LG V30 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.