Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-06-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge (2024), getting an 83.7 score against 78.5. These devices come with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. LG V50 ThinQ's design is a lot older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge (2024).
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge (2024) features a little more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and way less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola Edge (2024), because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution and a lot tinier back camera sensor taking much worse quality videos and photos, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.