Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-06-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge (2024), with an 81 score against 78.5. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14, so it provides you some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a incredibly older and a little heavier device than Motorola Edge (2024), but Samsung managed to build it thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2024) features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola Edge (2024) captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.