Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s global score of 78.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is much older than the Motorola Edge (2024), it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola Edge (2024) features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory. Motorola Edge (2024) features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge (2024) features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge (2024) also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations, a back camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Galaxy S6 edge+ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.