Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's global score of 78.5. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. LG V50 ThinQ is a better phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, we must highlight that it is also a notably older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier phone.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a slightly better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel number in each inch in the display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution camera, a way better video definition and a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality photos. LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.