Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's global score of 78.5. Although Samsung Galaxy A12 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it must be told that it's also older, heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A12 has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a way better display than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a higher screen pixel density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A12 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A12 features a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a way higher video quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a back camera with more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.