Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a global score of 84.7 against 78.5. The Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 OS. Galaxy A32's construction is older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a way better display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a better pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A32 counts with much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy A32 has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.