Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a 91.8 score against 78.5. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Although the Galaxy A71 5G is a better cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it must be told that it's also a older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a much less MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a lot better video resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.