Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 general score. Galaxy C9 Pro is an a lot older and somewhat heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Samsung was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12, so it provides lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit better pixel density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a way better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a camera in the back with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.