Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting an 86.5 score against 78.5. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy M31 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Although it's the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also an a lot older, heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a little bit higher count of pixels per screen inch, a quite bigger screen, a much brighter screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy M31 features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little bit better camera than Galaxy M31, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a way better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.