Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has an overall score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion body is much lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is extremely thicker and was released about a year before. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has 12 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better display than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a just a little higher pixels density, a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, much more brightness and a larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations and a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.