Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a global score of 83.1, which is a bit better than the LG V30's 79.1 overall score. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo body is notably newer and just a little bit lighter than LG V30's, but it is just a little thicker. The LG V30 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30 counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V30 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and better video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo features improved battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.