Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, getting a global score of 83.7 against 83.1. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12. LG V50 ThinQ is a notably older, a bit thicker and heavier device than Motorola Edge 30 Neo.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores. LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a higher screen density, a quite larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a battery duration that's just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Neo's battery life, although the LG V50 ThinQ has a 0 percent smaller battery size.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with faster video frame rates and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.