Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having an 87.1 score against 83.1. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a notably older, thicker and incredibly heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features just a little better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and better 120 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy Note9 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the battery duration in Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although the Samsung Galaxy Note9 has just 4000mAh of battery size instead of 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.