Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is just a bit better than the LG V20, having an 80.9 score against 77. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra body is notably newer than LG V20's, but it's a little thicker and heavier. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The LG V20 features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V20 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than LG V20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.