Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting a general score of 83.7 against 80.9. LG V50 ThinQ is a a little lighter phone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but both have the same thickness. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display. The LG V50 ThinQ has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has greater battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a much larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.