Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting a general score of 84.9 against 80.9. Although Galaxy A80 is a better phone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, we must note that it's also a noticeably older, a little heavier and thicker phone. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A80. Both of them have a screen of the same size, a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen and an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Galaxy A80 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have 8 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A80 also has a higher number of cores. The Galaxy A80's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's one, they have the same internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.