Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 score. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it was released 6 years before.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a quite higher number of pixels in each display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with more processing cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a lot better video definition and a much better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.