Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it must be told that it's also a lot older, just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display and a way lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Galaxy Note9 has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. Galaxy Note9 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better video quality, a much better 200 megapixels resolution back camera and a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.