Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a global score of 80.9, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has an older 12 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's body is a little bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is notably thicker and was released only 19 months before.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a way brighter screen, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a just a bit higher screen density and a larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of megahertz cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots better videos and photos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP and a larger sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.