Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a score of 85.5 against 80.9. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's body is a little bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it's a bit thicker and was released 4 years before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 7 more processing cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a really brighter display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger display. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a way higher resolution back camera and a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB and more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has greater battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.