Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having an 84.5 score against 77. The iPhone XS Max design is a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but it is somewhat heavier and was released many years before. The iPhone XS Max has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a bit sharper screen than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit worse number of pixels per inch of display, and they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much brighter screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features much more memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 57% larger battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.