Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 general score. The Google Pixel 2 is a lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but they are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 2 counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 2's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a way bigger sensor capturing much better quality photographs and a way higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.