Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having an 83.7 score against 77. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version. Although it's the best we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is a noticeably older, just a little bit heavier and a little thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much larger sensor and a lot more megapixels back camera.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features improved battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.