Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 2023-09-14 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's overall score of 77. Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, and Motorola Edge 40 Neo comes with Android 13 operating system. Galaxy A32 is a better phone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it must be told that it is also older, thicker and heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a better display density.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a back facing camera with more MP. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 features a battery life that is very similar to the battery performance in Motorola Edge 40 Neo.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.