Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a global score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's overall score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is an a lot older device than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.