Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 overall score. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a incredibly older, thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Galaxy Note9 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger display. Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.