Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a general score of 79.3 against 77. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. Galaxy S6 edge+'s body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it was released 8 years before.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a larger aperture, a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.