Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting an 84.5 score against 83.4. Although the iPhone XS Max is way older and a little heavier than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's design is still somewhat thinner. The iPhone XS Max features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a just a little greater pixels amount per display inch.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.