Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel 2, getting a general score of 83.4 against 81.6. Although Motorola Edge 40 Pro is way newer than the Google Pixel 2, it is just a little bit thicker and notably heavier. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot more mega pixels back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.