Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than the Google Pixel XL, with a global score of 83.4 against 81.3. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a heavier phone than Google Pixel XL, but both are equally thin. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way lower screen density, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Google Pixel XL has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser processing cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a much better resolution camera, a bigger aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.