Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's general score of 83.4. LG V50 ThinQ is an much older cellphone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but LG made it just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 15 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.