Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 score. Even though the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's noticeably thinner and also much newer. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the older 13 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater screen density.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an 18% larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.