Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A12's 80.3 general score. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version while Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features and enhanced performance. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is noticeably newer, just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A12.
Galaxy A12 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A12, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit larger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a camera with a better resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A12 features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.