Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's overall score of 83.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a older, a little bit thicker and just a little heavier device than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and Motorola Edge 40 Pro works with Android 13 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a bit larger display, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater display pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much higher video definition and a camera in the back with more megapixels. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.