Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a 90.5 score against 83.4. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G design is a little thinner than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it is just a little heavier and was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, and Motorola Edge 40 Pro comes with Android 13 OS.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better display than Galaxy A90 5G. They have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a screen of the same size and a greater pixels count per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a camera with more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations and a lot better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.