Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-04-04 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a extremely newer phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's much thicker and a little heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a just a little higher pixel quantity in each inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a much more mega-pixels back camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.