Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's general score of 83.4. Galaxy Note9's construction is noticeably older, a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little bit better display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with much more megapixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.