Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s global score of 79.3. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the newer 13 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. Even though the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is incredibly newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+, it's much thicker and noticeably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 7 lesser processing cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a back camera with a lot better resolution, a way bigger camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations and a much better video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.