Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 83.4 against 77.8. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an older 13 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Despite of the fact Motorola Edge 40 Pro is older and extremely thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still a little lighter.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a just a little better pixels density, a bigger screen and way more brightness.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a camera that is very similar to the Motorola Edge 40 Pro one, and although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos, they both have a camera with a 50 MP resolution, the same video frame rates and the same video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with greater battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 24% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.