Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 83.4. Even though Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is extremely older and a little thicker than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's construction is still just a little lighter. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a much brighter screen, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way higher resolution camera in the back, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.