Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40, getting an 84.5 score against 77.2. The iPhone XS Max is a heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 40, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. The iPhone XS Max has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 40 and the Apple iPhone XS Max both have really similar screens, because although the Apple iPhone XS Max has much darker display, and they both have a same size display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a camera with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 40 features a superior storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 has a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.