Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-05-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 score. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version. Even being the best device in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ's construction is notably older, just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 40.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a little more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch and a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a bit better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.