Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 2023-05-04 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40, getting a general score of 84.7 against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy A32's construction is incredibly older, thicker and heavier than Motorola Edge 40. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A32 counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 features just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a way bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments and a back camera with more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.