Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Motorola Edge 40, with a general score of 91.8 against 77.2. Despite being the best phone we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is incredibly older, just a little thicker and a little heavier than Motorola Edge 40. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version.
Motorola Edge 40 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos and a much smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.