Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13. Galaxy S6 edge+'s design is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Motorola Edge 40, even though it was released 8 years before.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better pixel density. Motorola Edge 40 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, although it has 7 less CPU cores and 4 GB less RAM. Motorola Edge 40 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos, a way more MP camera in the back and a way bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Edge 40 has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.